From the monthly archives:

November 2009

Surfing in Bali, Indonesia

by Adam Killam on November 13, 2009

Surfing in Bali here I come. Tonight I leave on a bit of an adventure and will be flying through Tapai to Denaspir Bali and then on to Kuhta to attend surf camp for 2.5 weeks.

I’m leaving the laptop at home for this one and am only taking a carry on bag, sandals, 2 t-shirts, 2 pairs of shorts and a few miscellaneous including a book on copy writing and the latest copy of INC magazine.

I’ll be checking in after I get settled but may have spotty Internet access until I return on December 3rd.

It’s been a great year, a busy year, and it’s time for a break.

Wish me luck!

[Post to Twitter] Tweet This Post  [Post to Plurk] Plurk This Post  [Post to Yahoo Buzz] Buzz This Post  [Post to Delicious] Delicious This Post  [Post to Digg] Digg This Post  [Post to Ping.fm] Ping This Post  [Post to Reddit] Reddit This Post  [Post to StumbleUpon] Stumble This Post 

{ 0 comments }

Normally I like Seth Godin’s writing, but today…..

by Adam Killam on November 6, 2009

I’m a fan of Seth Godin, widely known author and marketing guru. Safe to say most marketers are because he often shares pearls of wisdom and marketing insight on his blog and through is many books.

Today however, a client sent me a link to Godin’s post on the Unclicking 84% that I have an issue with, so I thought I’d raise it here.

Here are my thoughts…

  • Godin lacks clarity in this article and is off track..easy to point out a research report like this but neither his post or the post he linked to tell us as readers anything concrete about what to do. I tend to discount this kind of post..I also think this advice is far off the mark for most small and medium sized business who can’t afford to waste money. For SME’s, it’s important to: invest money in advertising -> measure results -> get sales -> improve the process. It’s not about “brand building” in my opinion, it’s about sales.
  • The 80/20 rule is what’s being talked about
  • Not clear if by “display ads” they mean banner ads, text ads, or all forms of online ads. Godin says ALL ads, the post he links to talks about display ads. No clear distinction.
  • I agree that if people click but don’t buy then there’s no point in wasting money on online ads unless you can get them to convert some other way like signing up for an email list or social media account so you can follow up with them
  • Google recently started measuring “View through click” stats which these two articles suggest are important. I think it’s an attempt to convince people to not to stop advertising during tough times and to continue wasting money on ads that just don’t work. Pretty hard to gauge whether they saw your ad and came back 20 or 30 days later and then converted despite what Google may say. How often does this happen in the real world?
  • Optimizing ads for clicks makes sense if you want to generate a lead or a sale. That doesn’t mean you are ignoring the “other 84%” of Internet users, it just means you have to reach them another way or that perhaps the 16% is the real group (aka the real someone) you are targeting. Also, this statement forgets the fact that direct response ads like Adwords, are meant primarily for buyers – if you’re paying for clicks, as an advertiser you want to see a return and you are after people looking to buy. You don’t want the 84% of people who are just looking for information to click on your ads. You want the 16% you can actually make a sale to. Fundamental flaw in the reasoning of Godin’s post and the post he references.
  • It’s not about getting 100% of people to your site. Just those who can and will buy.

I think the following lines, which Godin has bought into, are meant for big advertisers who are building brands and doing mass advertising aka they don’t have the need to drive direct sales and they are fine with wasting money:

Linda Anderson, comScore VP of marketing solutions and author of the study, concludes that “… marketers who attempt to optimize their advertising campaigns solely around the click are assigning no value to the 84% of Internet users who don’t click on an ad… ” – (this is BS, as stated in one of my points above. You don’t want the 84% just the 16% who can/will buy now.)

The results underscore the notion that, for most display ad campaigns, the click-through is not the most appropriate metric for evaluating campaign performance. Rather, advertisers should consider evaluating campaigns based on their view-through impact, says the report. (Again, hogwash. This is just meant to convince you to waste money on advertising dollars that have no direct correlation to sales.)

So what does this mean for you?

If you’re advertising using Google or other methods online and you’re working on getting the ads to be clicked on and the site converting those clicks into sales then bravo. That makes sense as long as you do it with eyes wide open: you’re not after 100% of the people out there.

If in a reasonable time frame say the next 2-3 months, you can’t get that to work, you should stop advertising and work on another angle. SEO for example or a blogger outreach program or purely focus on building relationships with affiliate marketers depending on what it is you’re selling and your market.

I don’t believe in “View through clicks”, despite what Google says is important or what Seth Godin has to say.

SME’s need to focus on: traffic + conversion = profits. Period.

[Post to Twitter] Tweet This Post  [Post to Plurk] Plurk This Post  [Post to Yahoo Buzz] Buzz This Post  [Post to Delicious] Delicious This Post  [Post to Digg] Digg This Post  [Post to Ping.fm] Ping This Post  [Post to Reddit] Reddit This Post  [Post to StumbleUpon] Stumble This Post 

{ 2 comments }

Google Analytics Tutorial: adding keyword rich content

by Adam Killam on November 4, 2009

Here’s a quick Google Analytics tutorial on how to see if the number of keywords on your site that result in visits each month is increasing.

The reason you might want to take a look at this number from month to month is that, ideally you’re going to see an upward trend in the number of non-paid (organic) search terms your site is receiving traffic for over time.

Typically, if you’re adding content to your site regularly (easy if you have a blog as part of your site or your site is built on a blogging platform such as Wordpress.org) then you should see a steady increase in the number of keywords that are resulting in visits to your site. What this shows you is that all that blogging is potentially paying off. ( I say potentially because traffic without some type of conversion is pointless and worthless!)

To track the number of keywords your site is receiving traffic for, open up Google Analytics ( you do have an analytics account right?) and click on Traffic Sources/Keywords on the left hand menu.

Google Analytics Tutorial

Then, at the bottom of the screen on the right, you should be able to see a number randing from 1 to XXX. The total will be the number you are looking for.

If you adjust the report to show the current month, then last month, and then switch to the month before last, you should see a steadily decreasing number as you go back in time, which means the total number of keywords your site is ranking for is increasing.

Now this won’t always be the case. It is possible that certain terms your site ranks for received more searches in a given month, especially if your business has seasonal elements to it. But for the most part, assuming you’re regularly adding content, you should experience a rise in traffic and a rise in the number of terms that bring in that traffic over the long term.

[Post to Twitter] Tweet This Post  [Post to Plurk] Plurk This Post  [Post to Yahoo Buzz] Buzz This Post  [Post to Delicious] Delicious This Post  [Post to Digg] Digg This Post  [Post to Ping.fm] Ping This Post  [Post to Reddit] Reddit This Post  [Post to StumbleUpon] Stumble This Post 

{ 0 comments }